Film & TV Rants & Raves

This blog consists of my rantings and ravings about movies and TV shows that I love (or hate). I’ve studied film at Harvard, Boston University, and the Cambridge School for Adult Education, and taught film studies as well. I’ve got lots of strong opinions, so look for them here!

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Everyone Has "Doubt"

The film "Doubt" begins with a sermon by Father Flynn, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman, in which he says that although our doubt and fear may make us feel isolated, it is really what bonds us all. The mere idea of doubt greatly troubles Sister Aloysius, played by Meryl Streep, and leads to suspicions, questions, and ultimately the squaring off of two of our greatest actors. Both are playing complex characters - we like the one and hate the other, but then we find that nothing is so simple. Amy Adams plays a young nun who would like nothing better than to reduce everything to black and white - but this story is full of gray, right down to the cinematography. The director gets a bit heavy-handed with metaphors (a literal cat-and-mouse game, lights that won't stay lit, an ill wind), but it is a very literary film, developed from his own Pulitzer Prize-winning play by John Patrick Shanley. The dialogue is crackling. In the end, we are left with suspicions, questions, and amazement at the extraordinary actors. Four scenes alone are like acting tutorials - Streep and Hoffman's two confrontations, Hoffman's scene with Amy Adams, and Streep's scene with Viola Davis, who plays the mother of a student at the Catholic school so brilliantly that she is nominated for both Golden Globe and SAG awards, even though her screen time is minimal. Ultimately, we all have to live with doubt in some form, but there's no doubt, this film is worth seeing for the performances alone.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

The Jazz Stylings of Jeff Bridges - Interview from 2000

Since his role in the Coen brothers’ film “The Big Lebowski”, Jeff Bridges is known far and wide as “the Dude.” In his latest film, “The Contender”, Bridges plays the President of the United States, so he now jokes that he prefers to be called “POTUS.”

During the recent Boston Film Festival, Bridges sat down with Back Bay Beat to discuss his new role in the Rod Lurie film, opening October 13th. Lurie was also present, and the two displayed a relaxed relationship indicative of a breathlessly fast film shoot that required trust and bonding on the part of both actors and filmmakers. The Contender” stars Joan Allen as a Democratic senator who is nominated for Vice President after the current VP dies in office. Gary Oldman plays a senator from the other side of the aisle who opposes her nomination and sets out to destroy her with a lurid tale from her past.

Responding to a question about what brought him to the role of the President, Bridges replied with enthusiasm that it was the script. “I was so excited after reading it, I remember running through the house to find my wife and tell her, ‘Hey, I think we got one here!’ ” He also remarked that the fact that the script was written especially for Joan Allen, his former co-star in “Tucker: A Man and His Dream,” and an actor he greatly respects, made a big difference, because he could picture her in the part as he read it and couldn’t imagine anyone else playing the role.

When asked what his feeling was about working with a less-experienced director, Bridges responded, “I’ve had very good luck with directors who haven’t had too many films under their belt. Peter Boganovich, Michael Cimino, the guy who directed “The Fabulous Baker Boys,” Steve Kloves. So I had no problem with that.”

Bridges explained that Lurie is his favorite type of director to work with – he’s a writer, so you can “create on the fly,” who although he has a strong vision for the film, is open to ideas from his collaborators that would enhance that vision. He added, “You can jam on the fly, like a jazz improvisation.”

Lurie commented, “One thing that Jeff does brilliantly is that once he has nailed a certain angle on a take, he will then give me something much different, a much different approach, so I can have my choices. For example, in the scene with Gary [Oldman] and Jeff on the [Presidential] yacht, Jeff gave it to me first very calmly, then very angry, then sort of very connivingly (sic). Theoretically, I could right now go and cut “The Contender” again and have a totally different Jeff Bridges performance, not the same character. An actor who can give you those kind of options is a godsend.”

Bridges added, “The sometimes frightening thing about making movies is that it’s a collaborative art form, and in the end it’s a collage. You’re making a collage. The actor makes a painting, and the director and the editor cut up the painting and put it back together however they want. As an actor, you can be very threatened by that. Many actors, they say, ‘I’ve gotta protect myself, and I’m only going to give the performance that I want to see on the screen.’ I believe that that’s really shooting yourself in the foot, because ultimately it’s the director who is going to do that. You have to have faith in him, and respect. Hopefully you make that decision correctly before you enter into the movie. So you do what he [Lurie] was saying, you give him a bunch of different ways, because you don’t know and he doesn’t know either, what’s the best way. So you tweak it and get it right.”

Asked how he prepared for the role of President Jackson Evans, Bridges explained his usual practice, “I would think about different aspects of myself that I want to use that kind of align with this fella, and magnify those, and let the ones that don’t fit, drop to the wayside. Then, of course, you look at the real guys, the politicians. I looked at some speeches of President Clinton, but I was really going out of my way not to do an impersonation of Clinton. So I looked at Robert and John Kennedy, speeches they gave, and documentary type stuff of those guys, and LBJ, Mario Cuomo, looked at some of that stuff. Then you look around, you look at people that you know that might remind you of the character, and the guy that kept coming up to me was my father [actor Lloyd Bridges]. He was a very gregarious kind of guy, and brought such joy and verve to his work. He loved what he was doing and it was almost contagious. The two movies I did with him when we were both adults, it was so great when he would come onto the set, [the level] would raise (gestures upward) like that.”

“Also, I’ve done some lobbying in DC, and that helped just to know that world a bit. I’m very involved with the hunger issue, I’ve belonged to a group for over twenty years now called the End Hunger Network. We used to be involved with world hunger, but now we’re focusing on hunger in the United States, because in the midst of this economic boom we’re having, hunger is running rampant. There so many programs that were in place ten or fifteen years ago that are not being properly funded, so I’ve done a lot of lobbying.”

The character of President Evans is rather quirky. One of his main eccentricities is calling up the White House kitchen at all hours and requesting very strange menu choices in an attempt to stump the staff. As Lurie points out, President Evans uses that quirk as a way to disarm people. Throughout the film, he provides a bit of odd comic relief. The character definitely has common ground with Jack Warrick, his character in the Albert Brooks comedy “The Muse.” When asked about how he feels going back and forth between these types of films and characters, Bridges replied, “I love hanging hard turns. It’s great to add variety, to keep it fun for myself, and it shows the filmmaking community that I can do different roles, so I can get offered these kinds of scripts. But I really approach comedy and drama the same ways. I think both elements are in both kinds of movies.”

There’s no doubt that the filmmaking community knows what Jeff Bridges is capable of. His grace and affability in person, and his talent on the screen, make it easy to see why he has made over 50 films with people who appreciated his ability to “hang hard turns.” Hail to the Chief! Hail to the Dude!


Review - The Contender

“The Contender,” while being billed as a political thriller, has no thrills. The director, Rod Lurie, was extremely fortunate in his casting of the film, and its stars, Joan Allen, Gary Oldman, and Jeff Bridges do their best, giving all their substantial talent to this weak script. The film tries hard to be noble, and instead is corny and hackneyed, and when it tries to be chilling in its depiction of political manipulations, it is laughable.

Senator Laine Hanson, Joan Allen’s character, while certainly noble and good, is almost too much so. Sure, she has one dark secret in her past. But that appears to be the only mistake she has ever made – otherwise, she is Superwoman – the perfect wife, the perfect mother, the perfect politician. Fortunately for Lurie, Allen gives the part and the entire film credibility with the sheer force of her acting ability.

Gary Oldman has a ridiculously bad balding hairstyle, but otherwise is remarkably restrained as Laine Hanson’s primary foe in her bid for the Vice Presidential nomination. There is one very good scene between Allen and Oldman, when the opponents sit down for a tense lunch meeting. Oldman uses food as a weapon to intimidate, brandishing his steak knife at her, but Allen holds her own, and the tension crackles between the two fine actors.

Jeff Bridges is fun as a President who enjoys his position and wants his legacy to be preserved. His eccentricities charm and disarm people to the point that his intelligence and fierce determination are often overlooked by both his friends and enemies. There is no question about Bridges’ talent and integrity, and again, Lurie was very fortunate to have actors of this caliber involved.

“The Contender” looks and sounds like a TNT cable movie, particularly in the way it is filmed. The cinematographer, Denis Maloney, unsurprisingly turns out to have shot several TV movies, as well a series of films entitled “Witchcraft 5,” “Witchcraft 6,” etc. You get the idea.

Sadly, “The Contender” coulda been great, with a major rewrite of both fuzzy plot and weak dialogue. The finest actors can only do so much.

Juno Dodges the Little Miss Sunshine Bullet

I was nervous about seeing "Juno," because of the "Little Miss Sunshine" effect. That film received so much hype, awards and nominations - I couldn't wait to see it! I went in with high expectations, and was hugely disappointed to find that it was a very minor film, albeit with good actors, but in no way was it a Best Picture candidate. I am not sure Juno really is either, but it is certainly deserving of its Best Screenplay and Best Actress noms. It's a funny and touching movie that is sweet without being cloying. It comes at you sideways, the way Juno herself does. She talks as though everything is just rolling off her, and makes light of tough situations with her dry wit, but Ellen Page lets us glimpse her emotions and makes us root for this stubborn, hilarious, special girl. The soundtrack is excellent and the rest of the cast is brilliant. Loved it.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Random Thought

Why do the ads for that new movie "Death at a Funeral" continually say "From the director of 'Bowfinger'?" Was Bowfinger an all-time high of comedy films, and I just missed the announcement?

Friday, April 28, 2006

A Dense, Strange Story

No new episodes recently, although I’m buckling up for the end of the season, which starts when it returns next week!  

But in the meantime, thought I’d share some words of wisdom from TV Guide’s critic, Matt Roush.  This comes from his “Ask Matt” section of TVGuide.com – new every Monday and Friday, and always a fun read.  In this Q&A, he perfectly encapsulates my feelings about the show.
Question: I read that Lost's ratings the week of the Rose-and-Bernard story were the lowest ever (coming in at around 15 million viewers.) I realize that's still high for most shows, but for a megahit like Lost it seems terrible. Do you think the writers will take the hint and make adjustments to the plot next year? I know most people complain about the reruns, but they don't bother me as much as the fact that after almost an entire season, the plot hasn't moved an inch. What's your opinion of the obviously lost plotlines of this year's biggest drama? Will next year change things up? — Brandy
Matt Roush: For me, the Rose-Bernard outing was a near-perfect episode of Lost. Psychologically, emotionally, suspensefully, it had it all. If Lost's numbers aren't what they should be, consider that American Idol is now one of its competitors. I'm not worried by — or, frankly, interested in — any of this. What would horrify me is if the producers of this unique show began reacting to ratings ups and downs, or to chronically impatient "fans," by rushing this dense, strange story toward some contrived climax. As was made clear in the most recent episode, only two months have passed in the lives of these characters since they landed on the island. Bernard's frustration with the survivors settling in for the long haul instead of looking for a new escape route illuminated that very point. There are still so many stories to tell on this show, stories that can enhance the mysteries of the island without explaining them just yet. I'd like Lost to run for years and years. I don't know why they'd try to fix what ain't broke just yet.
Check out “Ask Matt” here:
http://www.tvguide.com/TV/Roush/AskMatt

Thursday, April 13, 2006

SOS

SOS – isn’t that an ABBA song?  Poor Bernard…he just can’t not try.  But he tries too hard – maybe if he just went with one row of rocks instead of three, he could have gotten it finished!  

Anyway – it was great to see the back story of Bernard and Rose…and to find out what she has in common with Locke.  Loved that scene when she sat with him on the beach.  They are both so good at seeing into people and seeing their pain.  And of course, she knows he has experienced a miracle too because she saw him in his wheelchair in the airport.  How perfect.

Henry Gale is so creepy without even saying anything!  Except for what he did say about how Jack wouldn’t get Walt back.  Yipe!  

And Michael, poor Michael, stumbling out of the jungle.  The Others must have let him go when they heard Jack shouting and saw the opportunity to really screw with our gang.  I have a feeling that Michael has been brainwashed – it’s going to be like the Manchurian Candidate or something – and whatever he convinces them to do, it’s going to be BAD.

Can’t wait until May!

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Dave

I didn't realize Dave was imaginary - I should have picked up on that, but I just figured Hurley was hallucinating him on the island like Jack hallucinated his father, Kate hallucinated a horse, etc.  What's amazing to me is that Hurley hallucinated someone that he also hallucinated back in the real world!  So he really is or was a bit nuts. 
 
I loved the whole Henry thing - first when Sayid busted him for killing the real Henry Gale, that was great.  And then later when Locke was talking to him - when he said that God can't see the island, I had chills!

Oh and I also loved the Hurley/Sawyer smackdown!  How funny was it when Sawyer tried to crawl out from under the tarp and got pulled back in!  It was like a cartoon fight.

Good stuff all around.  Excellent job by Jorge Garcia as Hurley, and of course Dave was Evan Handler from Sex & the City!  

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Lockdown

Poor Locke!  Although he was a dope to let himself get screwed by his dad again.  I can't believe we STILL didn't find out how he became paralyzed!  Peg Bundy was great.  He really blew that situation.  It was so horrible when he was trapped under the door – excruciating!  
 And how great is Henry Gale as a character?  Except he ain't no Henry Gale!  I wonder if the real Henry Gale actually had a wife, or if he was just out ballooning in the South Pacific by himself.   And what did Henry do when he crawled through the vent?  He stopped the countdown, but the noises that happened after that, and the blue light that came on were not normal occurrences when the countdown stops.  And how about that drawing on the door above Locke?  It looked like a diagram of where all the hatches are on the island – but what’s in the center and why did it have a big question mark on it???

I am also trying to figure out what the connection is between the dropped shipment of supplies and the doors slamming shut inside the hatch.  I think maybe the broadcast Locke could hear was coming from a plane or something - but why would the doors shut like that if someone was dropping off stuff?  Why would someone be trapped inside the living quarters if they needed to get out of the hatch to pick up the supplies?  Anyway, it explains how it is that there are still edible Dharma O’s inside the hatch – they’re not twenty years old, they’re from periodic supply drops!